I
have always struggled with this verse. Not in a sense of knowing what it means
when taken in the proper context but when used as fodder for joining a church.
I have heard this verse used to support the idea of belonging to a certain
community of believers. They believed if you really wanted to be a part of
their church, then you would be baptized into the Church. Baptism was used to
demonstrate their allegiance to that Church. It wasn’t used as demonstrated by
Christ in Matthew 3:16. It wasn’t used as a public profession of faith, but as
a demonstration of loyalty. I’ve also seen this verse used to support the idea
of multiple baptisms. I was baptized as a teen and really didn’t know what I
was doing, so I’ve decided to be baptized again is something I hear frequently
within the church. I believe in one baptism and won’t get wrapped around the
axle as to what means is used to baptize. I have one particular kind of baptism
I favor, but if someone else explains to me the means of why they were baptized
and understand the theology behind it, I don’t struggle with it. It’s not a
show stopper for me. But when someone
approaches me who hasn’t been walking in obedience and wants to use baptism as
a means of rededicating their life to Christ, and uses this verse to support
his or hers position I have a problem with. Some would argue were they
regenerate in the first place? I agree with the author when he states “baptism
is not the means of salvation, but rather is closely tied as the subsequent
symbol of it.” I’m so glad to know that my salvation is not based on works
(baptism), but is based on my faith in Christ alone. No additional small print added
or hidden in the book of Revelation. We are saved through faith and not of
works (Titus 3:5; Eph 2:8-9). It takes the focus off of us and puts the
attention where it belongs, on the Cross.
No comments:
Post a Comment